A

Power connector

1

Speed Dependent Volume Control

2

n/c

3

Phone mute (ground to activate)

4

+12V (constant)

5

+ Aerial (12V when radio on)

6

+ Lights (12V when lights on)

7

+ACC (12V when ACC on)

8

GND

B

Speaker connector

1

+ Rear Right

2

- Rear Right

3

+ Front Right

4

- Front Right

5

+ Front Left

6

- Front Left

7

+Rear Left

8

- Rear Left

C1

CCU(*) connector

1

DTA

2

CLK

Performancewise, the 8500 and 9000 will outdo the 9200 because they are AGP.Whichever card option you choose, it's best to go with a single AGP card that will support the two monitors you desire.In this day and age, PCI graphics cards are only for macs without AGP (such as G3's or early G4's) or where more than two monitors are required.Cheers!Karl. Hi Kaushik,Re your original question of AGP vs PCI.PCI is definitely limiting performance wise because of a bandwidth bottleneck. Some sellers are offering modified cards for an additional $50 or 60 but without the power modification.e) Radeon 9600 Pro Mac Edition 256MB + 2 DVI-ADC adapters runs about $360.Options a, b and c will not support Core Image, while d and e will. Radeon 9600 pro agp 2dvi port for mac windows 7. But requires modifications (with tape) to work and (with solder) to run power to the ADC. AGP was originally developed as a way of overcoming this and making more powerful graphics cards feasible.The most powerful PCI graphics card that would work in your Mac is the ATI 9200, and the chipset for that card (virtually identical to the 8500 and the 9000) is considered quite dated by today's standards.

3

MIRQ

4

n/c

5

Radio ON

6

GND

C2
(**)

AUX connector (**)

7

n/c

8

n/c

9

n/c

10

Audio Left

11

Audio Right

12

Audio GND Hino diagnostic explorer 3.0 keygen.

C3

CD Changer connector

13

Tx (from HU to CDC or PC)

14

Rx (from PC or CDC to HU)

15

GND

16

12V (constant)

17

HU ON (12V when HU is ON)

18

SPDIF IN (***)

19

SPDIF GND (***)

20

(SPDIF GND) (***)